What the US SEC’s Innovation Exemption Means for Regulating Tokenized Assets in Africa’s Capital Markets

Author

VASPA Africa

Post Date

What the US SEC’s Innovation Exemption Means for Regulating Tokenized Assets in Africa’s Capital Markets

What the US SEC’s Innovation Exemption Means for Regulating Tokenized Assets in Africa's Capital Markets

On 17 September 2026, the U.S. SEC issued an exemptive order under Section 36 of the Securities Exchange Act, the so-called ‘Innovation Exemption’, granting five years of conditional relief to Tokenized Securities Venues (TSVs). TSVs may match buyers and sellers of tokenized NMS stocks through automated market maker (AMM) liquidity pools, with access limited to permissioned participants but smart contracts deployed on public blockchains, without being treated as an exchange or an alternative trading system. 

 

For the Virtual Asset Service Providers Association (VASPA), the order is a significant signal of how a leading regulator can open a supervised, time-bound path for on-chain trading. It is not a model to be copied, but a template that African capital market regulators can adapt to their own markets.

The Significance of the Innovation Exemption

The U.S SEC’s move acknowledges a fundamental market reality: legacy capital market frameworks were not designed to accommodate smart contracts, AMMs, or the real-time settlement capabilities of blockchain technology. Rather than forcing digital-native infrastructure into analog regulatory boxes, the U.S SEC has leveraged its statutory authority to carve out a five-year operational window for TSVs.  As the U.S SEC’s Chairman, Atkins, described the temporary relief, it “must be followed by durable rulemaking,” supporting our position that exemptions are a bridge to rules, not a substitute for them.

 

The order is not a free pass. It is tightly conditioned: tokenized shares must carry the same rights and privileges as the underlying class of shares; only a capped number of symbols may trade, within strict volume limits; smart contracts must be publicly auditable; issuers must be notified before unaffiliated third parties tokenize their shares, and may object within 30 days; tokenized trading must halt whenever the primary listing exchange halts; and anti-fraud, market-manipulation and AML rules continue to apply in full. Critics, including SIFMA and Better Markets, argue that the order creates a parallel regime with weaker protections. That debate is itself instructive for African regulators.

The exemption order arrives amid accelerating institutional activity. On 23 September 2026, Blockchain.com and the NYSE signed a non-binding memorandum of understanding to explore giving Blockchain.com’s customers access to tokenized U.S.-listed stocks and ETFs through NYSE’s planned digital trading platform, subject to regulatory approvals.”

 

Operating through the NYSE’s planned digital Alternative Trading System (ATS), this non-binding partnership aims to leverage on-chain settlement to offer fractional ownership and around-the-clock trading. By uniting the trust of traditional finance with digital asset innovation, the arrangement is designed to connect tens of millions of crypto-native users directly to traditional equities. The agreement also includes a two-way market data sharing initiative, embedding NYSE exchange data into the Blockchain.com app while bringing crypto analytics to traditional institutional investors via ICE Data Services. Whether, and on what terms, African investors may access such offerings will depend on local securities, foreign-exchange and VASP licensing rules. That is one more reason for African regulators to define their position now, rather than having it defined for them by offshore platforms.

What African Regulators Can Adapt

Several African regulators are already moving, positioning itself as a frontier for digital finance. SEC Nigeria has admitted tokenized-securities platforms to its Regulatory Incubation programme under the Investments and Securities Act 2025, and Kenya has operationalised its Virtual Asset Service Providers Act. The U.S. order offers these efforts a useful benchmark.

 

  • Use existing exemptive and sandbox powers to enable innovation: Where their enabling statutes allow, regulators need not wait for lengthy legislative amendments. Time-bound, conditional exemptions or well-structured sandboxes can let operators deploy tokenized securities venues under supervision, while evidence is gathered for permanent rules.
  • Balance innovation with strict safeguards: The U.S SEC’s model is designed to show that flexibility can coexist with strict oversight. African regulators can mandate equivalent corporate rights for token holders, enforce public auditability of smart contracts, and limit early-stage trading volumes to mitigate systemic risk while operators pilot their infrastructure. Thresholds must be calibrated to local market depth: in less liquid markets, a tokenized venue can quickly become the main source of price formation, so surveillance and coordination with the incumbent exchange matter even more.”
  • Enable capital formation: While the U.S. order is limited to listed equities, Africa’s greater need is capital formation. A clear, staged compliance pathway for tokenized local equities, bonds, and infrastructure assets, starting with professional investors before opening to retail, can attract capital that is currently locked out of illiquid markets.
  • Secure the legal plumbing first: A tokenized share is only as strong as the law that recognizes it. Company, registry, central securities depository, and settlement-finality laws should expressly recognise on-chain records as evidence of legal title, so that token holders enjoy the same rights as other shareholders in law and not merely by contract, including in insolvency.
  • Build a regulated cash leg and think regionally: The U.S. order allows tokenized shares to be paired only with qualifying stablecoins, tokenized money market funds, or other tokenized stocks. African regulators will need an equally robust settlement asset, whether a regulated stablecoin, tokenized deposits, or central bank money, and should coordinate across borders, through regional market-linkage and payment initiatives, so that tokenized venues deepen rather than fragment Africa’s capital markets.

 

Franklin Peters, Executive Chair of VASPA and CEO & Co-Founder of Boundlesspay, highlighted the strategic imperative of this regulatory approach for the continent:

 

“The U.S. SEC’s Innovation Exemption is a strong example of developmental regulation: it moves the regulatory posture from enforcement alone towards supervised enablement. With institutions such as the NYSE now exploring partnerships with digital asset platforms, the market signal is clear. For African jurisdictions, the lesson is that conditional, time-bound exemptions for tokenized assets can unlock new liquidity for local enterprises, foster homegrown innovation and connect Africa’s capital markets to the global digital economy.”

 

Speaking to the regulatory mechanics that make this exemption effective, Buki Ogunsakin, Trustee of VASPA and Principal at BBO Solicitors, noted:

 

“From a legal and compliance perspective, this exemption balances innovation with structural safeguards. By requiring smart contracts to be auditable, enforcing trading halts, and ensuring token holders retain equivalent corporate rights, the U.S SEC has created a permissioned environment where technology can prove its resilience. Capital market regulators across Africa can adapt this condition-based model, provided that company, registry, and settlement laws recognize the token as legal title to the underlying share, so that the ‘same rights’ condition is legally enforceable and not just contractual.”

 

Dr. Souhayel Tayeb, Board Advisor at VASPA, added:

 

“The significance of the U.S. SEC’s order lies less in what it permits than in how it permits it: time-bound, capped, conditional and transparent. That is the right template for Africa, but it must be adapted, not copied. The U.S. experiment rests on deep primary markets, a reliable reference price and settled law on who owns a share. Many African markets must first secure that foundation: legal recognition of the token as title, settlement finality and a regulated cash leg. Regulators who get this plumbing right, and calibrate safeguards to local liquidity, will give investors the protection they need and innovators the certainty they deserve.”

 

Global capital markets are becoming increasingly tokenized. VASPA will continue to work with regional regulators to design practical, secure, and proportionate frameworks, so that Africa helps shape the next generation of global finance rather than merely importing it.

About VASPA

The Virtual Asset Service Providers Association (VASPA) is a Pan-African industry body registered as an Incorporated Trustee with the Corporate Affairs Commission in Nigeria (CAC IT: 79069970) where it is headquartered. VASPA comprises individual, corporate, and institutional members from across Africa. For more information about us, please visit our website, www.vaspa.org. To become a Patron or Partner of VASPA, visit our Membership page: https://vaspa.org/join-us/. Individual and corporate members are also welcomed.

Related Posts

VASPA Charts a Path with NFIU on Financial Information Sharing

The Virtual Asset Service Providers Association (VASPA) today announced the official release of the Project Green-White-Green (GWG) Whitepaper, a sovereign-focused regulatory framework designed to securely integrate virtual assets into Nigeria’s formal financial ecosystem.